Snake Bites
18th May 2026
When we talk about overseas travel and remote area risk assessments, many people imagine snake bites and IEDs as a plausible risk when in reality, for most people, more valid concerns would be environmental illness and D&V.
But, depending on where you are travelling, snake envenomation may be a very real concern.
Epidemiology
Accurate snakebite statistics are difficult to assemble because (1):
Non-fatal bites by venomous species are underreported by epidemiological databases
Poison centres are not consulted on all bites
Many bites are never reported beyond a primary treating facility.
Finally, an unknown but likely significant number of snakebite casualties never seek medical treatment, especially if alarming symptoms fail to develop.
With that in mind, snakebites are estimated to lead to as many as 9,000 emergency department visits annually in the United States. Venomous species account for approximately one-third of these visits, almost all of which are pit viper bites. (2)
In Australia, 16 deaths from envenomation were reported between 2000 and 2016. (3)
Most snakebite casualties are male, with white men 25 to 34 years old being at the greatest risk of life-threatening envenomations. (4) This is commensurate with most trauma being associated with men participating in higher-risk activities and misadventure.
The majority of envenomations occur during intentional interaction with the snake, sometimes associated with alcohol or drug intoxication (5-7), and typically occur when people try to catch, kill, or interfere with a wild snake, as well as when handling or caring for captive snakes. Bites from intentional encounters are predominantly on the hands and arms. (2)
Bites from unintentional encounters are predominantly on the lower extremities. (2) Certain protective clothing, such as leather or heavy boots, offers a protective barrier against envenomation, and denim may reduce the amount of venom by two-thirds. (8, 9)
Types of Venomous Snakes
Whilst there are many thousands of sake species, only some are venomous, and only some of those are dangerous enough to present a danger to humans. Many of these snakes are inoffensive or far too small to envenomate a person effectively.
In broad terms, the three families of venomous snakes of concern are Elapidae, Viperidae and Atractaspididae
Elapidae
These include
Cobra: South and South East Asia and Africa.
Coral snake: The southern United States through Central America to Argentina.
Taipan: Australia and New Guinea
Mambas: Sub-Saharan Africa
Kraits: South and Southeast Asia, ranging from Pakistan to southern China, and down into Indonesia.
Characterized by their permanently erect fangs at the front of the mouth. Most species are neurotoxic. The main group of toxins are PLA2 and three-finger toxins (3FTx).
Other toxic components in some species comprise cardiotoxins and cytotoxins, which cause heart dysfunctions and cellular damage, respectively. Cobra venom also contains hemotoxins that clot or solidify blood.
Viper
Viper species can be found across the Americas, Africa, Eurasia, and South Asia.
All viperines are venomous and have long (relative to non-vipers), hinged fangs that permit deep envenomation of their prey. Most viper venom contains a range of protein-degrading enzymes, called proteases, that produce symptoms such as pain, strong local swelling and necrosis, blood loss from cardiovascular damage, complicated by coagulopathy. Also being haemotoxic in nature, viperine venom causes vascular endothelial damage and haemolysis (rupturing of red blood cells). Death is usually caused by a collapse in blood pressure.
Atractaspididae
These include Mole vipers, stiletto snakes, or burrowing asps and are found in sub-Saharan Africa and parts of the Middle East, including Israel and Jordan.
Many of these snakes are inoffensive or far too small to envenomate a person effectively. Some bites can still be excruciatingly painful, the stiletto snake, for example, and some can inflict severe tissue necrosis.
Some of the long-fanged species are able to envenomate even while their mouths are closed, and the typical grasp used by herpetologists to securely hold venomous snakes is not safe for this group. (10, 11). This ability to stab sideways even with a closed mouth is the basis for an English name used for some of them: "side-stabbing snakes" or "side-stabbers". (12)
Types of venom
| Toxin | Effects | Snakes |
|---|---|---|
| Cardiotoxins | Damage heart muscle (cardiomyocytes) by disrupting cell membranes, leading to depolarization, calcium influx, and ultimately, heart dysfunction or arrest. | Cobras and Puff Adder |
| Cytotoxins | Destroys cells and tissues (necrosis) at the site of the bite, causing severe pain, swelling, blistering, and potential limb damage, often through enzymes that attack cell membranes, leading to localized tissue death. | Typically, Cobras and some spiders |
| Dendrotoxins | Neurotoxins that work by blocking specific voltage-gated potassium channels in nerve cells, which enhances the release of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine, leading to increased nerve excitability, seizures, and potential respiratory paralysis in animals. | Mambas |
| Haemotoxins | Disrupt blood clotting either causing (cobra) or preventing clotting (viperidae). Early signs of coagulopathy include uncontrollable bleeding from the wound site or bleeding gums. | Vipers and Rattlesnakes |
| Myotoxins | Muscle spasms and paralysis. | Sea snakes and Crotaline |
| Neurotoxins | Block nerve signals to muscles, leading to rapid paralysis, respiratory failure, and potentially death, often acting quickly and without intense localized pain. Early signs of neurotoxicity include drooping eyelids followed by decreasing loss of motor control, starting with the digits. |
Cobras, Mambas, Kraits, and Death Adders. |
| Proteolytic | Contains enzymes that break down proteins and tissues, aiding digestion and causing immediate local damage. | Found in most venoms, especially vipers. |
Symptoms
Severe tissue necrosis following Bothrops asper envenomation that required amputation above the knee. The person was an 11-year-old boy, bitten two weeks earlier in Ecuador, but treated only with antibiotics.
Gutiérrez JM, Theakston RD, Warrell DA (June 2006). "Confronting the neglected problem of snake bite envenoming: the need for a global partnership". PLOS Medicine. 3 (6) e150. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030150. PMC 1472552. PMID 16729843.
Local tissue effects from hemotoxins can cause significant erythema, swelling, and tenderness at the envenomation site and can spread proximally and distally.
Local tissue effects are the most common physical manifestations of viper envenomations and occur in more than 90% of casualties with medically significant envenomations. (13)
Systemic symptoms, including hypotension, bleeding, angioedema, vomiting, and neurotoxicity, indicate more severe envenomation. (14)
Haematologic effects are multi-factorial and include the degradation of fibrinogen and platelet aggregation or destruction. Although the majority of casualties do not develop medically significant bleeding, the casualty should be carefully examined for petechiae, ecchymosis, gingival (gum) bleeding, epistaxis or retinal haemorrhage. (15)
Vomiting can also arise from an autonomic response to fear and anxiety, and may be misleading. Hypotension can result from vasodilatation and third-spacing ( the unintentional passage of fluid through increased porosity of the vessel walls due to vasodilation into surrounding tissue or interstitial spaces.
Treatment
Retreat
Immediately move away from the area where the bite occurred.
If the snake is still attached, use a stick or tool to make it let go. Sea snake victims need to be moved to dry land to avoid drowning.
Identify
In areas where there are more than one naturally occurring venomous snake species and the offending snake has been killed, it should be brought with the casualty for identification. Care should be taken to avoid touching the head, as even a dead or decapitated snake may have intact bite reflexes. (16, 17)
No attempt should be made to pursue the snake into the undergrowth, risking further bites.
Try to identify the snake – determining whether the biting snake is a venomous species or not can make the difference between simple superficial wound care and a potentially hazardous and expensive evacuation.
There can be real difficulties in identifying snakes:
A good photograph, however, carefully taken from a safe distance (i.e. of more than the length of the snake) can sometimes be sent via cell or satellite phone to an expert and may be valuable later for identification.
For the Responder familiar with envenomations, a positive identification of a non-venomous snake would not necessitate evacuation; however, identification must be certain. Observation for the sake of risk stratification is not recommended. (1)
Field guides and other publications list literally hundreds of “dangerous” species literally; however, the taxonomy of these snakes remains incompletely defined as ongoing genetic analyses are improving species characterisation. (18) Some experts suggest the elimination of many subspecific designations altogether. (19)
Practically, there are issues with snake identification; anecdotally, most envenomated casualties describe simply seeing a dark flash as the snake quickly envenomates and moves away, usually into hiding.
Reassure
Many will fear sudden death and may behave irrationally or even hysterically. The basis for reassurance is the fact that many venomous bites do not result in envenoming, the relatively slow progression to severe envenoming (hours following elapid bites, days following viper bites) and the effectiveness of modern medical treatment.
Many snake bites are caused by non-venomous snakes.
Many bites from venomous snakes are ‘dry bites’ where little or no venom is released.
On average, 50% of snakebites are dry bites (20), depending on where you are in the world:
Taipans inflict dry bites only 5% of the time. (21)
Cortalines (pit vipers, including rattlesnakes) deliver dry bites 25% of the time. (13)
Australian eastern brown snakes (Pseudonaja textilis) can inflict dry bites 80% of the time. (21)
A dry bite should never be assumed, and serial observations and laboratory tests should be performed as indicated to monitor the possible development of envenoming. If there are fang marks and a positive identification of a venomous snake, one must assume there is associated envenomation and seek medical attention immediately because delaying care increases morbidity and mortality. If evacuation is difficult or prolonged, the absence of local or systemic symptoms 8 hours after the bite may indicate a dry bite (1).
In most venomous snake bites, the risk of death is not immediate.
Initiate Evacuation
Remove any constrictions (rings, bracelets, shoes etc. ) from the injured limb in anticipation of swelling.
Arrange urgent evacuation: There is nothing that can be done in the field to significantly alter the outcome of a serious snake bite, and field first aid should not delay rapid transfer to a facility capable of safely administering antivenom. (22)
Evacuation must be to a healthcare facility with access to antivenom. The nearest healthcare facility should be contacted ahead of time. If antivenom is unavailable, it may be sent from another facility, or the casualty’s immediate transport to a different facility should be arranged. This process can also be coordinated by contacting poison control directly.
Further reading: Travel Risk Assessments
First aid and wound care can be administered whilst waiting for evacuation or en route.
Time and date of the snake bite should be noted, either on the casualty or in an incident report.
The circumference of the bitten appendage should be measured above and below the snake bite for later comparison and determination of subsequent swelling. (23, 24)
Immobilisation & Pressure bandages
The benefit of pressure immobilisation bandaging depends on whether the bite is from a viper or elapid:
Vipers
Pressure Immobilisation is not recommended for Viper bites. (25-27) There have been no studies directly assessing immobilisation alone for the improvement of snake bite outcomes. Limiting movement of the affected area by immobilisation with splinting techniques (without compression) may benefit the casualty, although no rigorous trials have validated this practice.
Crotaline venom causes more localised tissue damage, and pressure bandaging may instead increase the severity of tissue damage; one animal study demonstrated lethal hyperkalemia when the pressure wrap was removed. (28)
Elipidae
There is some evidence that pressure bandaging can decrease morbidity and mortality in life-threatening Elapidae snakebites containing neurotoxic venom (such as Australian or elapids or the Black Mamba in Sub-Saharan Africa) (27, 29) and Coral snakes (30).
Pressure bandaging must be applied appropriately: two studies indicated that physicians and lay people rarely apply pressure bandaging correctly (31-33), and a third showed that even after training, practitioners were still unsuccessful at effective immobilisation in cases of simulated snakebites. (34)
Pressure bandaging is thought to restrict the blood flow and progression of venom to systemic circulation by reducing lymphatic and venous return. One study using a porcine model with a lethal dose of venom showed that pressure immobilisation increased intracompartmental pressure after envenomation and delayed mortality. (35)
The limb and joints should be kept in a functional position in case they swell or the joints become immobile. (36,37)
Tourniquets are not recommended as they can lead to ischemia and compartment syndrome, which can result in a higher amputation frequency or antivenom requirements. No studies have conclusively demonstrated that tourniquets improve casualty outcomes. (22, 38, 39)
Further Reading – Compartment Syndrome
Vomiting may occur, so place the unconscious casualty in the Safe Airway Position.
Closely monitor the airway and breathing and be ready to resuscitate if necessary.
Further Reading: CPR in Remote Environments
Wound Care and Infection
Snakebites should be approached in a manner similar to that for any other puncture wound or laceration. Without delaying transport, the wound should be quickly cleaned in standard fashion (soap and running water, high-pressure irrigation or an antiseptic solution or both) and a sterile dressing applied to protect the wound. (40)
Anaerobic and aerobic bacteria can be introduced by the snake’s fangs during the bite. (41)
Despite this inoculation, wound infections occur in only 3% of pit viper bites. (42)
A prospective trial compared prophylactic antibiotic treatment to none after pit viper envenomation and found no significant differences in rates of infection between the groups. (43) One analysis noted 0% infection rate after crotaline envenomation and prophylactic antibiotics. (44)
Chloramphenicol failed to reduce the frequency of abscess formation complicating pit viper snakebites in a randomised controlled trial. (45)
Based on current evidence, prophylactic antibiotics are not recommended, and antibiotics should only be administered if signs of infection develop, such as purulence (other signs of infection may be obscured by local tissue changes caused by venom (1) ).
Any significant open wounds should be treated with moist dressings changed twice daily, and large debrided areas treated with negative pressure dressings. (40)
Tetanus immunisation should be updated if needed. (46)
In Viperidae bites where pressure immobilisation is not recommended, early active and passive physical therapy with range of motion is recommended, especially for hand and digit bites to avoid stiffness and long-term dysfunction. (47)
Pain Relief
Opioids are preferred for pain control. Aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are relatively contraindicated owing to risks of increased bleeding, platelet dysfunction, and potential for renal issues in casualties with rhabdomyolysis. (48-50)
Antivenoms
Anitvenoms alone are not a panacea; Intravenous access should be achieved early, the hydration state determined and corrected if needed, and vital signs must be closely monitored.
The early administration of an adequate dose of effective antivenom to casualties with signs of envenomation is critical, so plans should be made in advance to identify the nearest sources of antivenom. If this is not possible, then symptomatic treatment, including support of airway patency and breathing, maintenance of circulation and control of bleeding, pain relief and the treatment of local wounds, should be prioritised as appropriate.
Special Cases
Pregnancy
Pregnant women with envenomations should be managed in close collaboration with an obstetrician. Snakebite envenomations may lead to increased morbidity to the foetus, and as many as 20% of documented viper envenomations in pregnancy have associated foetal death, with or without antivenom treatment. There have been no reported adverse reactions to crotaline antivenom in the mother or fetus (51); however, owing to envenomation, the foetus is at higher risk of coagulopathy-related complications such as placental abruption. (52)
Therefore, snakebite casualties who are pregnant should receive antivenom as indicated and foetal assessment or monitoring. (53)
Paediatrics
Pediatric viper snakebite casualties should receive the same dose of crotaline FabAV antivenom as an adult. The antivenom counteracts snake venom and is dosed according to the amount of venom injected, not the casualty’s body weight. Crotaline FabAV Antivenom has been shown to be safe to use in paediatric and infant populations. (54-59)
Anaphylaxis
Antivenom-induced hypersensitivity reactions and serum sickness occur in approximately 8% and 13%, respectively, of casualties treated with FabAV. (60) Some can be severe, and providers should be prepared to treat with adrenaline, steroids, antihistamines and emergency airway management. (61)
Pretreatment for the prophylaxis of allergic reactions should be given to casualties who have had prior allergic reactions to antivenom and should be considered for casualties with a history of asthma, atopy, or multiple allergies.
Diagnostics
Spontaneous haemorrhage due to envenoming by some snake species is an important clinical indication for antivenom. Diagnosis is aided by a test known as the 20 Minute Whole Blood Clotting Test (20WBCT). A clean, dry glass bottle or vial into which 1-2 millilitres of venous blood is added, is allowed to stand at room temperature for 20 minutes, and is then inverted and the presence or absence of a complete clot is recorded. Where a blood clot is present, the test result is negative, whereas if no clot forms and the blood remains liquid, the test result is positive, indicating the presence of a coagulopathy and the need for antivenom treatment.
The result should be communicated to the receiving facility as this can improve the reporting of snakebite envenoming and assist in determining optimal antivenom needs for regions.
DO NOT
Use a mechanical suction device or ‘venom extractor’; experimental models showed that mechanical suction devices can increase localised tissue damage around the wound in the shape of the device, causing tissue necrosis and sloughing, resulting in tissue loss that prolonged healing by weeks. (62-66)
Attempt to suck venom from the wound; it is ineffective, can introduce bacteria to the wound and can be potentially dangerous for the person performing the suction (62, 66)
Use electrical shock therapy. (67-69)
Use ice. Packing the affected limb in ice (cryotherapy) is contraindicated, as it may worsen necrosis. (70-72)
Use aspirin or Ibuprofen, as these may exacerbate haemorrhage bleeding.
Use alcohol on the wound or as an oral analgesic.
References
Kanaan NC, Ray J, Stewart M, Russell KW, Fuller M, Bush SP, Caravati EM, Cardwell MD, Norris RL, Weinstein SA. (2015) “Wilderness Medical Society Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Pit viper Envenomations in the United States and Canada”. Wilderness & Environmental Medicine. 26(4):472-87
O’Neil ME, Mack KA, Gilchrist J, Wozniak EJ. (2007) “Snakebite injuries treated in United States emergency departments, 2001–2004”. Wilderness & Environmental Medicine. 18:281–287.
Welton RE, Liew D and Braitberg G. (2017). “Incidence of fatal snake bite in Australia: A coronial based retrospective study (2000–2016)”. Toxicon. 131:11-15.
Morgan BW, Lee C, Damiano L, Whitlow K, Geller R. (2004) “Reptile envenomation 20-year mortality as reported by US medical examiners”. Southern Medical Journal. 97:642–644.
Morandi N, Williams J. (1997) “Snake bite injuries: contributing factors and intentionality of exposure”. Wilderness & Environmental Medicine. 8:152–155.
Wingert WA, Chan L. (1988) “Rattle snake bites in Southern California and rationale for recommended treatment”. Western Journal of Medicine. 148:37–44.
Kurecki B, Brownlee H. (1987) “Venomous snake bites in the United States”. The Journal of Family Practice. 25:386–392.
Warrell DA. (2010) “Snakebite”. Lancet. 375:77–88.
Herbert SS, Hayes WK. (2009) “Denim clothing reduces venom expenditure by rattle snakes striking defensively at model human limbs”. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 54:830–836.
Kurnik D, Haviv Y, Kochva E. (1999). "A snake bite by the Burrowing Asp, Atractaspis engaddensis". Toxicon. 37 (1): 223–227.
Deufel A, Cundall D. (2003). "Feeding in Atractaspis (Serpentes: Atractaspididae): a study in conflicting functional constraints" (PDF). Zoology. 106 (1): 43–61.
Spawls S, Branch B. (1995). The Dangerous Snakes of Africa. Ralph Curtis Books. Dubai: Oriental Press. 192 pp.
Glenn JL, Straight RC. (1982) “The rattle snakes and their venom yield and lethal toxicity”. In: Tu A, ed. Rattlesnake Venoms, Their Actions and Treatment. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1982.
Tanen DA, Ruha AM, Graeme KA, Curry SC. (2001) “Epidemiology and hospital course of rattle snake envenomations cared for at a tertiary referral center in central Arizona”. Academic Emergency Medicine. 8:177–182.
Boyer LV, Seifert SA, Clark RF, et al. (199) “Recurrent and persistent coagulopathy following pit viper envenomation”. Archives of Internal Medicine. 159:706–710.
Gold BS, Dart RC, Barish RA. (2002) “Bites of venomous snakes”. New England Journal of Medicine. 347:347–356.
Suchard JR, Lo Vecchio F (1999) “Envenomations by rattle snakes thought to be dead”. New England Journal of Medicine. 340:1930.
Torstrom SM, Pangle KL, Swanson BJ. (2014) “Shedding sub-species: the influence of genetics on reptile subspecies taxonomy”. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 76:134–143.
Douglas ME, Douglas MR, Schuett GW, Porras LW, Holycross AT. (2002) “Phylogeography of the Western rattle-snake (Crotalus viridis) complex, with emphasis on the Colorado Plateau.” In: Schuett GW, Höggren M, Douglas ME, Greene HW, eds. Biology of the Vipers. Eagle Mountain, UT: Eagle Mountain Publishing. 11–50.
Pucca MB, Knudsen C, S Oliveira I, Rimbault C, A Cerni F, Wen FH, Sachett J, Sartim MA, Laustsen AH, Monteiro WM. (2020) “Current Knowledge on Snake Dry Bites”. Toxins (Basel). Oct 22;12(11):668
Dart RC. (2004) Medical Toxicology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. p. 1551.
Michael GC, Thacher TD, Shehu MI. (2011) “The effect of pre-hospital care for venomous snake bite on outcome in Nigeria”. Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 105:95–101.
Ashton J, Baker SN, Weant KA. (2011) “When snakes bite: the management of North American Crotalinae snake envenomation”. Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal. 33:15–22.
Anz AW, Schweppe M, Halvorson J, Bushnell B, Sternberg M, Koman AL. (2010) “Management of venomous snake bite injury to the extremities”. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 18:749.
Seifert S, White J, Currie BJ. (2011) “Pressure bandaging for North American snake bite? No!” Clinical Toxicology (Phila). 49:883–885.
American College of Medical Toxicology; American Academy of Clinical Toxicology; American Association of Poison Control Centers; European Association of Poison Control Centres and Clinical Toxicologists; International Society on Toxinology; Asia Pacific Association of Medical Toxicology. (2011) “Pressure immobilization after North American Crotalinae snake envenomation”. Clinical Toxicology (Phila). 49:881–882.
Currie BJ, Canale E, Isbister GK. (2010) “Effectiveness of pressure-immobilization first aid for snake bite requires further study”. Emergency Medicine Australasia. 20:267–270.
https://www.who.int/teams/control-of-neglected-tropical-diseases/snakebite-envenoming/treatment
German B. Hack J. Brewer K & Meggs W. (2004). “Efficacy of a Pressure-Immobilization bandage in delaying the onset of systemic toxicity in a porcine model of eastern coral snake (Micrurus fulvius) envenomation”. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 44(4), S90.
Meggs WJ, Courtney C, O’Rourke D, Brewer KL. (2010) “Pilot studies of pressure-immobilization bandages for rattlesnake envenomations. Clinical Toxicology (Philadelphia). 48:61–63.
Norris RL, Ngo J, Nolan K, Hooker G. (2005) “Physicians and lay people are unable to apply pressure immobilization properly in a simulated snake bite scenario”. Wilderness and Environmental Medicine. 16:16–21.
Simpson ID, Tanwar PD, Andrade C, Kochar DK, Norris RL. (2008) “The Ebbinghaus retention curve: training does not increase the ability to apply pressure immobilization in simulated snakebite—implications for snake bite first aid in the developing world”. Transaction of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 102:451–459.
Canale E, Isbister GK, Currie BJ. (2009) “Investigating pressure bandaging for snake bite in a simulated setting: bandage type, training and the effect of transport”. Emergency Medicine Australasia. 21:184–190.
Bush SP, Green SM, Laack TA, Hayes WK, Cardwell MD, Tanen DA. (2004). “Pressure immobilization delays mortality and increases intracompartmental pressure after artificial intramuscular rattle snake envenomation in a porcine model”. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 44:599–604.
Lavonas EJ, Ruha AM, Banner W, et al. (2011) “Unified treatment algorithm for the management of crotaline snake bite in the United States: results of an evidence-informed consensus workshop”. BMC Emergency Medicine. 11:2.
Wall C. (2012) “British Military snake-bite guidelines: pressure immobilization”. Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps. 158:194–198.
Theakston RD. (1997) “An objective approach to antivenom therapy and assessment of first-aid measures in snake bite”. Annals of Tropical Medicine & Parasitology. 91:857–865.
Amaral CF, Campolina D, Dias MB, Bueno CM, Rezende NA. (1998) “Tourniquet ineffectiveness to reduce the severity of envenoming after Crotalus durissus snakebite in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil”. Toxicon. 36:805–808.
Quinn RH, Wedmore I, Johnson E, et al. (2014) “Wilderness Medical Society practice guidelines for basic wound management in the austere environment”. Wilderness & Environmental Medicine. 25:295–310.
Russell FE, Carlson RW, Wainschel J, Osborne AH. (1975) “Snake venom poisoning in the United States.” Journal of the American Medical Association. 1975;233:341–344.
Clark RF, Selden BS, Furbee B. (1993) “The incidence of wound infection following crotalid envenomation”. Journal of Emergency Medicine. 11:583–586.
Kerrigan KR, Mertz BL, Nelson SJ, Dye JD. (1997) “Antibiotic prophylaxis for pit viper envenomation: prospective, controlled trial”. World Journal of Surgery. 21:369–373.
Lo Vecchio F, Klemens J, Welch S, Rodriguez R. (2002) “Antibiotics after rattle snake envenomation.” Journal of Emergency Medicine. 23:327–328.
Jorge MT, Malaque C, Ribeiro LA, et al. (2004) “Failure of chloramphenicol prophylaxis to reduce the frequency of abscess formation as a complication of envenoming by Bothrops snakes in Brazil: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 98:529–534.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2011) “Updated recommendations for use of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and a cellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices 2010”. Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report. 60:13–15.
Cowin DJ, Wright T, Cowin JA. (1998) “Long-term complications of snake bites to the upper extremity.” Journal of the Southern Orthopaedic Association. 7:205–211.
Lavonas EJ, Ruha AM, Banner W,et al. (2011) “Unified Treatment algorithm for the management of crotaline snake-bite in the United States: results of an evidence-informed consensus workshop”. BMC Emergency Medicine. 11:2.
Levine M, Ruha AM, Padilla-Jones A, Gerkin R, Thomas SH. (2014) “Bleeding following rattle snake envenomation in patients with preenvenomation use of antiplatelet or anticoagulant medications”. Academic Emergency Medicine. 21:301–337.
Weinstein SA, Warrell DA, WhiteJ, Keyler DE. (2011) “Venomous” bites from non-venomous snakes: a critical analysis of risk and management of “colubrid” snake bites. London: Elsevier
LaMonica GE, Seifert SA, Rayburn WF. (2010) “Rattlesnake bites in pregnant women.” Journal of Reprodtive Medicine. 55:520–522.
Zugaib M, deBarros AC, Bittar RE, Burdmann EA, Neme B. (1985) Abruptio placentae following snakebite”. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 151:754–755.
Langley RL. (2010) “Snakebite during pregnancy: a literature review.” Wilderness & Environmental Medicine. 21:54–60.
Goto CS, Feng SY. (2009) “Crotalidae polyvalent immune Fab for the treatment of pediatric crotaline envenomation.” Pediatric Emergency Care. 25:273–282.
Offerman SR, Bush SP, Moynihan JA, Clark RF. (2002) “Crotaline Fab antivenom for the treatment of children with rattlesnake envenomation.” Pediatrics. 110:968–971.
Shaw BA, Hosalkar HS. (2020) “Rattlesnake bites in children: antivenin treatment and surgical indications.” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 9:1624–1629.
Trinh HH, Hack JB. (2005) “Use of CroFab antivenin in the management of a very young pediatric copperhead envenomation.” Journal of Emergency Medication. 29:159–162.
Pizon AF, Riley BD, Lo Vecchio F, Gill R. (2007) “Safety and efficacy of Crotalidae polyvalent immune Fab in pediatric crotaline envenomations.” Academy of Emergency Medicine. 14: 373–376.
Campbell BT, Corsi JM, Boneti C, Jackson RJ, Smith SD, Kokoska ER. (2008) “Pediatric snakebites: lessons learned from 114 cases.” Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 43:1338–1341.
Schaeffer TH, Khatri V, Reifler LM, Lavonas EJ. (2012) “Incidence of immediate hypersensitivity reaction and serum sickness following administration of Crotalidae polyvalent immune Fab antivenom: a meta-analysis.” Academic Emergency Medincine. 19:121–131.
Costello MW, Heins A, Zirkin DA. (2006) “Diagnosis and management of North American snake and scorpion envenomations. EBMedicine.net. 8:1–28.
Alberts MB, Shalit M, LoGalbo F. (2004) “Suction for venomous snakebite: a study of "mock venom" extraction in a human model.” Annals of Emergency Medicine. Feb;43(2):181-6.
Bush SP, Hegewald K, Green SM, et al. (2000) “Effects of a negative-pressure venom extraction device on local tissue injury after artificial rattle snake envenomation in a porcine model”. Wilderness & Environmental Medicine. 11:180–188.
Bush SP, Hardy DL. (2001) “Immediate removal of Extractor is recommended” [Letter]. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 38:607–608.
Bush SP. (2004) Snake bite suction devices don’t remove venom: they just suck”. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 43:187–188.
Riggs BS, Smilkstein MJ, Kulig KW, et al. (1987) “Rattle snake envenomation with massive oropharyngeal edema following incision and suction”. Abstract presented at: AACT/AAPCC/ABMT/CAPCC Annual Scientific Meeting; October 2,1987; Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Johnson E, Kardong K, Mackessy S. (1987) “Electric shocks are ineffective intreatment of lethal effects of rattlesnake envenomation in mice”. Toxicon. 25:1347–1349.
Howe N, Meisenheimer J. (1988) “Electric shock does not save Snake bitten rats”. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 17:254–256.
Welch BE, Gales BJ. (2001) “Use of stun guns for venomous bites and stings: a review”. Wilderness & Environmental Medicine. 12:111–117.
Frank HA. (1971) “Snake bite or frostbite: what are we doing? An evaluation of cryotherapy for envenomation”. California Medicine. 114:25.
Watt CH. (1978) “Poisonous snake bite treatment in the United States”. Journal of the American Medical Association. 240:654–656.
Toschlog EA, Bauer CR, Hall EL, Dart RC, Khatri V, Lavonas EJ. (2013) “Surgical considerations in the management of pit viper snake envenomation”. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 217:726–735.
